Differentiating Tungiasis From Other Skin Conditions
Published on: October 30, 2025
Differentiating Tungiasis From Other Skin Conditions
  • Article author photo

    Sowmya Tallam

    Bachelor of Science - BS, Biomedical Sciences Honours, Keele University

Introduction

Tungiasis is a parasitic skin disease caused by the female sand flea Tunga penetrans. Originally from South America, it was introduced into sub-Saharan Africa in the 19th century.1 Tungiasis is considered a neglected tropical disease, particularly in resource-limited communities.2 It is commonly seen among travellers, residents of urban slums, and riverside communities.3

In 2020, the prevalence of diagnosed individuals with tungiasis in sub-Saharan African regions was reported at 33.4%. Accurate diagnosis is essential to enable timely treatment, prevent complications such as secondary infections, chronic inflammation, or tissue damage, and avoid misdiagnosis with other dermatological conditions, which could lead to inappropriate treatments and delayed care.4 Differentiating tungiasis from similar skin conditions is therefore critical to effective management.

Pathophysiology and clinical presentation of tungiasis 

Life cycle of tunga penetrans

Infestation begins when the female sand flea penetrates the host's skin, typically through poorly sanitised areas such as beaches or stables. The flea usually targets the toes, soles, periungual areas, lateral foot edges, and heels, burrowing head-first into the epidermis while leaving the posterior abdomen exposed.5

Once embedded, the flea feeds on the host's blood and undergoes hypertrophy, causing its abdomen to swell to a size of about 1 cm (up to 2,000 times its original size) as it matures and produces eggs. Over approximately two weeks, the flea releases eggs through the exposed part of its abdomen, which fall to the ground and continue the life cycle.6 Following egg release, the flea dies, and the host’s immune system begins to eliminate the parasite, forming lesions in the process.

Key clinical features

The primary symptom of tungiasis is pruritus (itching). Localised pain, tenderness, and irritation in the area also occur. If the parasite remains embedded, a brown-coloured papular lesion forms, initially 0.5–2 mm in size, surrounded by erythema. As hypertrophy progresses, lesions enlarge to 3–10 mm in diameter with a small central black dot. Inflammation may result in ulceration, heat, pain, erythema, and flaking of the surrounding epidermis3.

Differential diagnosis: similarities and distinguishing features 

Scabies

Scabies is a parasitic infestation caused by tiny mites called Sarcoptes scabiei. The condition is similar to tungiasis due to the tiny mites causing the infestation by laying eggs and causing an itchy rash on the skin. 

Similarities:

  • Pruritus (itching)
  • Caused by arthropods 
  • Cluster lesions 

Distinguishing features: 

  • Scabies lesions are found in intertriginous areas (e.g., wrists, elbows, groin)
  • Presence of mite burrows rather than embedded fleas

Cutaneous myiasis

Cutaneous myiasis is a common clinical type of myiasis. It is a parasitic skin infestation caused by larvae (maggots).7 

Similarities:

  •  Lesions with a central opening

Distinguishing features:

  • Larger lesion size in myiasis, often exuding serous fluid
  • Larvae, rather than adult fleas, are present

Bacterial skin infections

Bacterial skin infections are caused by bacteria, leading to symptoms such as inflammation, pain, redness and more.8 Bacterial skin infections have similarities to secondary infections in tungiasis.

Similarities: 

  • Swelling
  • Erythema

Distinguishing features:

  • No central black dot in bacterial infections
  • Purely bacterial aetiology rather than parasitic

Fungal infections

Fungal infection (mycosis) is a skin disease caused by a fungus, which can be found on plants, dirt and household surfaces

Similarities: 

  • Skin thickening
  • Pruritus
  • Scaling

Distinguishing features:

  • Lack of localised nodules or embedded fleas in fungal infections
  • Fungal infections typically have an annular lesion with scaling at the edge

Plantar warts

Plantar warts, also known as verrucae plantari, are caused by the human papillomavirus (HPV).9

Similarities: 

Distinguishing features:

  • The presence of thrombosed capillaries (black dots) in warts differs from flea-associated nodules

Diagnostic tools and techniques 

Clinical examination

Diagnosis begins with clinical assessment. Key features include visible eggs attached to the posterior end of the flea and brownish excretory threads, which are pathognomonic. Lesions are usually localised to the feet, especially periungual areas, soles, and interdigital spaces. Multiple clustered lesions may appear in endemic areas or after repeated exposure. Swelling, erythema, and potential secondary infection may accompany the lesions.10,11

Dermatoscopy

Dermatoscopy is a non-invasive skin imaging technique that can be utilised for the diagnosis of skin lesions.12 For tungiasis, it can reveal the embedded flea’s abdomen and the surrounding inflammatory response. Eggs or excretory products may also be observed.13

Histopathology

Histopathology examination can confirm the presence of embedded fleas and provide insight into tissue reactions. Features include epidermal thinning, eggs within the flea’s abdomen, inflammation triggered by immune cells (neutrophils, eosinophils, macrophages), and microvascular damage leading to haemorrhage and oedema.14-16

Imaging (atypical or severe cases)

  • Ultrasound: Useful for detecting embedded fleas in clustered lesions or when the lesion is obscured2,17
  • X-ray: Detects deep tissue involvement or complications such as osteomyelitis in chronic cases2,18

Combined use of these diagnostic methods supports differentiation from other conditions and informs targeted treatment strategies.

Management implications of accurate diagnosis 

Appropriate treatment for tungiasis

Tungiasis does not have a standard treatment; however, surgical extraction of the flea is commonly performed.19 Secondary bacterial infections can be prevented by using antiseptic applications.

Avoidance of mismanagement

Accurate diagnosis prevents complications such as secondary bacterial infections and chronic inflammation, and allows selection of appropriate therapeutic interventions, including antifungal creams if indicated.20

Public health perspective

As a neglected tropical disease, education of healthcare workers and communities in endemic regions is vital. Awareness campaigns, environmental sanitation, and integration into national health programmes can reduce disease burden.1

Conclusion 

Tungiasis is a parasitic skin condition characterised by a central black dot and local inflammation. Early recognition and accurate diagnosis are essential for effective treatment and to prevent misdiagnosis. This can be difficult due to various differentials such as scabies, myiasis, bacterial infections, and fungal diseases. Therefore, education on the topic is essential for individuals in these endemic regions to reduce the disease burden. Future efforts should focus on developing affordable diagnostic tools, increasing awareness through healthcare worker training, and implementing sustainable public health strategies, including environmental sanitation and integration into national health programs. 

FAQs

What is tungiasis?

A parasitic skin condition caused by a sand flea, specifically a female sand flea. It breaks through the epidermis of the skin on the foot when someone steps on it. It is more common in subtropical areas with poor sanitation and sandy environments. 

Symptoms to look out for:

  • Small black dot at the centre of a swollen, red lesion
  • Itching, pain, and inflammation around the affected area
  • Possible ulceration or secondary infection if left untreated

How is tungiasis different from other insect bites?

Unlike general insect bites:

  • Tungiasis lesions grow larger over time as the flea matures
  • The black dot represents the embedded flea’s body
  • Persistent itching and pain are more severe compared to typical insect bites

References

  1. Feldmeier H, Heukelbach J, Ugbomoiko US, Sentongo E, Mbabazi P, von Samson-Himmelstjerna G, et al. Tungiasis—A Neglected Disease with Many Challenges for Global Public Health. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases [Internet]. 2014 Oct 30 [cited 2019 Sep 20];8(10):e3133. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4214674/
  2. Abrha S, Heukelbach J, Peterson GM, Christenson JK, Carroll S, Kosari S, et al. Clinical interventions for tungiasis (sand flea disease): a systematic review. The Lancet Infectious Diseases [Internet]. 2021 Aug 1 [cited 2022 Sep 15];21(8):e234–45. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1473309920308537
  3. Tardin Martins AC, de Brito AR, Kurizky PS, Gonçalves RG, Santana YRT, de Carvalho FCA, et al. The efficacy of topical, oral and surgical interventions for the treatment of tungiasis: A systematic review of the literature. Vinetz JM, editor. PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 2021 Aug 20;15(8):e0009722.
  4. Thelancet.com. 2025 [cited 2025 Jan 26]. Available from: https://www.thelancet.com/article/S0140-6736(15)01239-8/fulltext
  5. Hakeem MJML, Morris AK, Bhattacharyya DN, Fox C. Tungiasis – A cause of painful feet in a tropical traveller. Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2025 Oct 29]; 8(1):29–32. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1477893909001604
  6. Heukelbach J. Tungíase. Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo [Internet]. 2005 [cited 2025 Oct 29]; 47(6):307–13. Available from: https://revistas.usp.br/rimtsp/article/view/30947
  7. K R, A K. Cutaneous Myiasis: A Review of the Common Types of Myiasis [Internet]. International journal of dermatology. 2010. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20883399/
  8. Stevens DL, Bryant AE. Impetigo, Erysipelas and Cellulitis [Internet]. Ferretti JJ, Stevens DL, Fischetti VA, editors. PubMed. Oklahoma City (OK): University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center; 2016. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK333408/
  9. Witchey DJ, Witchey NB, Roth-Kauffman MM, Kauffman MK. Plantar Warts: Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, and Clinical Management. J Am Osteopath Assoc [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2025 Oct 29]; 118(2):92. Available from: http://jaoa.org/article.aspx?doi=10.7556/jaoa.2018.024
  10. Chinonye Ezenwaka. Tungiasis: Biology, Life Cycle, Epidemiology, Diagnosis, Prevention, and Treatment. Academiaedu [Internet]. 2023 Sep 28 [cited 2025 Jan 26]; Available from: https://www.academia.edu/107358082/Tungiasis_Biology_Life_Cycle_Epidemiology_Diagnosis_Prevention_and_Treatmen
  11. Franck S, Feldmeier H, Heukelbach J. Tungiasis: more than an exotic nuisance. Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease [Internet]. 2003 [cited 2025 Oct 29]; 1(3):159–66. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1477893903000814
  12. Sonthalia S, Kaliyadan F. Dermoscopy Overview and Extradiagnostic Applications [Internet]. PubMed. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2020. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK537131/
  13. .Wu X, Marchetti MA, Marghoob AA. Dermoscopy: not just for dermatologists. Melanoma Management. 2015 Feb;2(1):63–73.
  14. Bitam I, Dittmar K, Parola P, Whiting MF, Raoult D. Fleas and flea-borne diseases. International Journal of Infectious Diseases [Internet]. 2010 Aug 1;14(8):e667–76. Available from: https://reader.elsevier.com/reader/sd/pii/S1201971210000299?token=BAD447191438088ADAF5C083814E8E2712AAE089E9ECF6CEEC3A101260E6E4938355E25D1B2761E90688BC3CB9DEAB4B
  15. Newton K, Dixit VM. Signaling in Innate Immunity and Inflammation. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology [Internet]. 2012 Jan 31;4(3):a006049–9. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3282411/
  16. Mittal MK, LacKamp A. Intracerebral Hemorrhage: Perihemorrhagic Edema and Secondary Hematoma Expansion: From Bench Work to Ongoing Controversies. Frontiers in Neurology. 2016 Nov 21;7.
  17. Matthews MJ, Stretanski MF. Ultrasound Therapy [Internet]. PubMed. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31613497/
  18. Tafti D, Maani CV. X-ray Production [Internet]. PubMed. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2021. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30725731/
  19. Heukelbach J. Revision on tungiasis: treatment options and prevention. Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy [Internet]. 2006 [cited 2025 Oct 29]; 4(1):151–7. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1586/14787210.4.1.151
  20. Nwalozie R, Chinonye Oluchi Ezenwaka. Tungiasis: Biology, Life Cycle, Epidemiology, Diagnosis, Prevention, and Treatment. South Asian Journal of Parasitology [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2025 Jan 26];6(2):83–93. Available from: https://journalsajp.com/index.php/SAJP/article/view/155

Share

Sowmya Tallam

Bachelor of Science - BS, Biomedical Sciences Honours, Keele University

arrow-right