Introduction
Your fingers can flex or extend due to specific cords known as tendons that connect or insert at the points where bones meet, which are referred to as joints. The movement of these tendons results in movements at the joints. Their names are derived from their position; for example, the tendons located on the back or dorsum of the hand are known as extensor tendons, whereas those on the palm leading to the fingers are termed flexor tendons. Injury to the extensor tendon that connects to the joint close to the fingernail, called the distal interphalangeal joint or, in short, DIP joint, leads to a mallet finger. It is caused when a sudden force bends the finger at the DIP joint, potentially tearing it off alone or with a fracture of the bone occurring at the joint.1,2
It is commonly observed in sports injuries, such as those in baseball. It also results from sudden falls, cuts with sharp objects, road traffic accidents, accidents at home or assaults causing an open wound at the site. It is commonly known as a jammed finger.2
Although it can be a minor injury, treatment can affect quality of life. Untreated mallet finger can cause problems in joint movement due to imbalanced extensor forces. Lengthening the tendon affects extension, while shortening restricts DIP joint movement. Improper care may lead to ongoing pain, deformity, and swan neck deformity.2
This article aims to discuss surgical and non-surgical treatment of mallet finger injuries and compare their outcomes.
Extensor tendons
The fingers of the hand contain three short bones known as phalanges, while the thumb consists of two bones. They are called the proximal phalanx, middle phalanx, and distal phalanx, lined up from the palm to the fingertip for each finger. The point where these bones connect is referred to as a joint. The joint closest to the palm is referred to as the proximal interphalangeal joint, whereas the one nearer to the fingertip is known as the distal interphalangeal joint (DIP). The extensor tendons are essential for the backward bending or extension of the fingers. It is common in males, especially the young or middle-aged. The middle finger is the most commonly affected. 2
How to get mallet finger
Abrupt forced bending or flexion of a straight fingertip or hyperextension causes this tendon to be disrupted. It can result from injuries of various degrees, ranging from minor to major. It leads to an extensor lag when moving the digit, and if it remains untreated, a swan neck deformity (SND) of the finger or osteoarthritis (OA) of the DIP joint may develop. An examination of the finger for a mallet finger diagnosis reveals that the distal phalanx is BENT at about 45 degrees, and the person cannot extend the DIP joint. 3,4
Classification of mallet finger injuries
A mallet finger injury can be classified into different types of injuries.2,5
Closed injury vs open injury
- Closed: there is no open wound at the site of impact
- Open: this is accompanied by a cut or loss of skin at the site. It is caused by a deep cut at the site or an open wound, which also affects the tendon, tearing it off with or without the bone
Tendinous mallet versus bony mallet injury
- Tendinous mallet: only the tendon is torn
- Bony mallet: there is a fracture of the distal phalanx in addition to the tendon injury
Acute or chronic
- Acute mallet injury: an individual seeks care within 4 weeks of injury
- Chronic mallet injury: treatment is sought after 4 weeks of injury
Treatment of mallet finger
Non-surgical treatment
Nonoperative treatment is recommended as the primary option for nearly all mallet finger injuries. It is now regarded as the standard procedure for injuries that do not involve fractures, lack volar subluxation of the distal phalanx, or affect less than one-third of the articular surface
The treatment involves using splints to keep the DIP joint in hyperextension for 6 weeks, followed by 2-6 weeks of nighttime splints or during intense activities. The joint must remain hyperextended, even when cleaning fingers.
The splints available come in different types, and the results of their application are similar:
- Thermoplastic splints that can be tailored to the specific finger or created
- 3D printed splints
- Aluminium foam splints
- Metal splints
- Plastic splints
Although the splints are mostly applied over the palmar surface, they can be applied to any surface of the finger so long as the DIP joint is hyperextended. Compliance is important because, if the finger is flexed during treatment, the treatment time will need to be restarted, prolonging the treatment time.4,6,7,8,9
Complications related to the use of splints include poor compliance, maceration of the skin, pain, and allergy to the splint.2
Surgical treatment
For mallet finger related to a distal phalanx fracture, surgery is advised when the fracture affects over 30% of the articular surface. Surgical management options consist of closed reduction with percutaneous pinning or open reduction with fixation. Closed reduction can be accomplished by utilising an extension block K-wire to reposition the fracture fragment and secure the extensor tendon.
On the other hand, open reduction methods for mallet injuries linked to distal phalanx fractures have been implemented with comparable effectiveness. The application of the open technique provides improved access to the fracture location, allowing direct visualisation of the fracture fragments and facilitating easier reduction and fixation. While open repair methods are said to yield positive outcomes, they carry a greater risk of complications than closed repair methods.
In patients who do not improve despite all these surgical options, fusion of the affected joint or arthrodesis in a slightly bent or flexion position will reduce pain, improve cosmesis and function.12,3,11
Outcomes of non-surgical treatment
Functional recovery
- Good outcomes in most patients with compliant splint use13
- It is cheap and convenient
- Minor extension lag may remain, but often without symptoms
Complications
- Skin irritation or skin breakdown from splint use
- Stiffness, poor compliance leading to recurrence
- Nail deformity
- Long duration of treatment, including loss of work hours
- Longer duration to return to work14
Outcomes of surgical treatment
Functional recovery
- Can restore alignment and stability in complex cases
- Similar range of motion to non-surgical in many studies
Complications
- Higher risk of infection, hardware irritation, nail deformity, implant failure, implant removal, joint pain
- Possible stiffness or tendon adhesion
- Rupture of the tendon
Comparison of surgical vs. non-surgical outcomes
Effectiveness
Comparable functional outcomes of non-surgical and surgical treatment are seen in most cases.14
Risk profile
- Non-surgical: lower risk, fewer complications
- Surgical: higher complication rate, but needed in complex cases15,16
Recovery time and cost
- Non-surgical treatment: often, cheaper, longer splinting and duration of treatment require compliance to achieve success
- Surgical treatment: higher cost, potentially faster in complex injuries, shorter recovery time, and more accurate15,16
Summary
Mallet finger injuries are common, arising from either minor injuries or major accidents. A majority of mallet injuries are treated non-surgically with good outcomes, especially in compliant patients. Surgery is indicated in open injuries, significant joint displacement, and when surgical means are not successful. Most studies show comparable outcomes when either method is used. Treatment should be individualised based on the type of injury, compliance, patients’ occupation, and needs.
References
- Yee J, Waseem M. Mallet finger injuries. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 [cited 2025 Jul 13]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK459373/
- Alla SR, Deal ND, Dempsey IJ. Current concepts: mallet finger. Hand (New York, N,Y) [Internet]. 2014 Jun [cited 2025 Jul 13];9(2):138–44. Available from: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1007/s11552-014-9609-y
- Smit JM, Beets MR, Zeebregts CJ, Rood A, Welters CFM. Treatment options for mallet finger: a review: Plast and Reconstr Surg. [Internet]. 2010 Nov [cited 2025 Jul 13];126(5):1624–9. Available from: http://journals.lww.com/00006534-201011000-00024
- Lamaris GA, Matthew MK. The diagnosis and management of mallet finger injuries. Hand (New York, N,Y) [Internet]. 2017 May [cited 2025 Jul 13];12(3):223–8. Available from: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1558944716642763
- Garberman SF, Diao E, Peimer CA. Mallet finger: Results of early versus delayed closed treatment. J. Hand Surg. [Internet]. 1994 Sep [cited 2025 Jul 9];19(5):850–2. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/0363502394902003
- Cheung JPY, Fung B, Ip WY. Review on mallet finger treatment. Hand Surg [Internet]. 2012 Jan [cited 2025 Jul 13];17(03):439–47. Available from: https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S0218810412300033
- Cronin UM, Shannon A, Ó hAodha M, O’Sullivan A, Cummins NM, OSullivan L. What is known from the existing literature about the treatment of Mallet Injury using 3D printed splints? A Scoping Review Protocol. HRB Open Res [Internet]. 2024 Aug 16 [cited 2025 Jul 9];7:21. Available from: https://hrbopenresearch.org/articles/7-21/v2
- Katzman BM, Klein DM, Mesa J, Geller J, Caligiuri DA. Immobilization of the mallet finger: effects on the extensor tendon. J Hand Surg. [Internet]. 1999 Feb [cited 2025 Jul 9];24(1):80–4. Available from: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1016/S0266-7681%2899%2990041-4
- Pike J, Mulpuri K, Metzger M, Ng G, Wells N, Goetz T. Blinded, prospective, randomized clinical trial comparing volar, dorsal, and custom thermoplastic splinting in treatment of acute mallet finger. J. Hand Surg [Internet]. 2010 Apr [cited 2025 Jul 9];35(4):580–8. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0363502310000079
- Deml C, Baradaran A, Chen N, Nasr M, Kachooei AR. Fowler central slip tenotomy or spiral oblique retinacular ligament reconstruction? A cadaveric biomechanical study in swan-neck deformity. Hand (New York, N,Y) [Internet]. 2020 Sep [cited 2025 Jul 17];15(5):620–4. Available from: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1558944719834643
- Hanz KR, Saint-Cyr M, Semmler MJ, Rohrich RJ. Extensor tendon injuries: acute management and secondary reconstruction: Plast Reconstr Surg [Internet]. 2008 Mar [cited 2025 Jul 13];121(3):109e–20e. Available from: http://journals.lww.com/00006534-200803000-00046
- Doyle JR (1999) Extensor tendons—acute injuries. In: Green DP, Hotchkiss RN, Pederson WC (Eds) Green operative hand surgery (4th ed). Philadelphia, PA: Churchill Livingstone pp. 1962–1971.
- Groth GN, Wilder DM, Leroy Young V. The impact of compliance on the rehabilitation of patients with mallet finger injuries. J. Hand Ther [Internet]. 1994 Jan [cited 2025 Jul 10];7(1):21–4. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0894113012800378
- Stern PJ, Kastrup JJ. Complications and prognosis of treatment of mallet finger. J. Hand Surg. [Internet]. 1988 May [cited 2025 Jul 13];13(3):329–34. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0363502388800029
- Peng C, Huang RW, Chen SH, Hsu CC, Lin CH, Lin YT, et al. Comparative outcomes between surgical treatment and orthosis splint for mallet finger: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Plast. Surg. Hand Surg. [Internet]. 2023 Feb 28 [cited 2025 Jul 13];57(1–6):54–63. Available from: https://medicaljournalssweden.se/JPHS/article/view/12205
- Lin JS, Samora JB. Surgical and nonsurgical management of mallet finger: a systematic review. J Hand Surg. [Internet]. 2018 Feb [cited 2025 Jul 13];43(2):146-163.e2. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S036350231730045X

