Introduction
Frontonasal dysplasia (FND) is a rare but complex congenital condition affecting the central aspect of the face, including the forehead, nose, and upper lip. Individuals with this condition often have a broad nasal bridge, hypertelorism (widely spaced eyes), and sometimes midline clefts. These deformities can affect both facial appearance and function, leading to vision problems, speech challenges, and breathing difficulties. However, advances in reconstructive surgery have significantly improved the expectancy for those with FND.
This article delves into the latest updated surgical techniques used in the reconstruction of frontonasal dysplasia and explores the outcomes of these surgical interventions. Focusing on making this information easily comprehended and reachable by laypersons.
Understanding frontonasal dysplasia (FND)
Frontonasal dysplasia occurs as a result of an abnormal genetic disorder during embryiogenisis and before birth, especially in the chromosome X, which explains why females are more affected by this disorder than males. There are at least three types of frontonasal dysplasia that differ according to the anomaly of the genetic causing symptoms and features.
- FND type 1, characterized by abnormalities of the nose, long distance between the nose and upper lip, and droopy eyelids
- FND type 2, distinguished by (alopecia) hair loss and enlarged openings in the upper skull bones. Males with this type show genital deformities
- FND type 3, typically distinctive with a variant severe facial deformity, missing of eyes, or very small eye openings, and small ears
The goal of reconstructive surgery in FND is to restore facial symmetry, improve breathing and vision, and enhance overall appearance.1
The need for reconstructive surgery
The need for reconstructive surgery for frontonasal dysplasia is not just an aesthetic correction. FND is associated with anatomical defects that affect the individual's quality of life; these defects can lead to functional issues such as impaired vision due to hypertelorism, breathing difficulties from nasal malformations, and speech problems due to oral clefting. Surgical intervention begins in early infancy, normally at the age of 6–8 years old and, in severe cases, by the age of 2 years old. So it is crucial to address these issues early and offer treatment to promote normal development.
Parents and caregivers are typically involved in making decisions about surgical timing and goals, with consideration given to the child's growth, psychological impact, and the potential need for multiple surgeries over time.2
Modern surgical techniques in frontonasal dysplasia reconstruction
The severity of the deformation and the patient's overall health are the main determinants of the type and technique of the reconstructive surgery; these surgeries are highly individualised.
The following are the up-to-date surgical techniques for FND:
Craniofacial reconstruction
Orbital box osteotomy
This technique is commonly used to correct hypertelorism by repositioning the orbits to bring them closer together. The surgery involves cutting and moving the bones around the orbits to achieve a more normal appearance and improve binocular vision.3
Frontal bone remodeling
Frontal bone remodeling is needed for patients with a prominent or abnormal forehead. This technique involves the repositioning or reshaping of bones in the skull and forehead to correct deformities, create a more typical contour, and reduce the broad nasal bridge appearance.4
Nasal reconstruction
Cartilage grafting
Nasal deformities are a hallmark of FND, and the reconstruction technique involves grafting cartilage from the patient’s ribs or ears to reconstruct the nasal frame. Recent technology development provides the use of 3D-printed custom implants that provide precise structural support and enhance the cosmetic outcomes.5
Alar base reduction
This is a rhinoplastic technique that reduces the width of the nostrils and reshapes the nose’s base. This requires the surgeon to understand the extent of the deformation to get satisfactory results.6
Midface advancement
Le fort III osteotomy
This technique is used to improve the midface area, improving both the aesthetic and functional aspects, like breathing and bite alignment. The fort III osteotomy procedure is to cut the bones of the midface and move it forward using the osteogenesis process, where the moved bones are gradually encouraged to grow new bones in the forward direction.7
Rigid external distraction (RED) devices
This device is used in conjunction with the osteotomy, and it is widely used. It is an external device that allows for the gradual, controlled development of the midface bones over time, resulting in more stable and precise outcomes.8
Soft tissue reconstruction
Z-plasty and local flap techniques
Both techniques are utilised to reform the soft tissue abnormalities, including clefts in the lip and palate. These methods use the repositioning of the soft tissues to create more natural contours and improved appearance and functions.9
Fat grafting and dermal fillers
Recently, these techniques gained popularity for the correction of soft tissue defects. These procedures with minimal incision are used to add volume and improve facial symmetry without the need for extensive surgery.10
Advanced technologies in reconstructive surgery
3D imaging and surgical planning
It is a modern surgical planning technique employing a fully digital treatment method for the reconstruction procedures. It allows surgeons to create detailed, personalized models and prints of the patient’s anatomy with great precision for the details. It offers greater accuracy, anticipates preoperative potential challenges, and customizes implants.11
Virtual surgical planning (VSP)
This technique combines both 3D imaging and computer simulation. It allows surgeons to go through rehearsals of complex operations and optimize the procedure outcomes. The technique is particularly used in osteotomy procedure planning that ensures accurate bone repositioning.
Secondary and revision surgeries
For the complexity of some FND types, multiple surgeries may be needed. Upon the growth of the child, revision surgeries may be needed to refine the original procedure outcomes or handle new concerns. Modern surgical techniques have made the secondary revision surgeries more predictable and less complicated.6
Outcomes of reconstructive surgery for frontonasal dysplasia
There has been a significant improvement in the reconstructive surgery outcomes upon using the modern techniques and the multidisciplinary approach mentioned above. Below are the areas that represent the advancement difference:
Aesthetic outcomes
Modern reconstructive techniques have revolutionized the aesthetic outcomes for patients with FND, such as craniofacial reconstruction and nasal grafting, which improve facial symmetry. The outcomes of the normal appearance and reduced stigma were astonishing.
Functional outcomes
Functional outcomes hold the same level of importance. For instance, hypertelorism correction improves the appearance as well as enhances the binocular vision, while midface advancement relieves breathing difficulties and improves dental occlusion. The patient’s overall health and well-being definitely improve with the gain of these functional outcomes.
Psychological impact
The psychological benefits, particularly for children, are of profound importance as an outcome of the reconstruction techniques. Improved facial appearance and functions can elevate self-confidence and social communication, and reduce the psychological pain of living a childhood with visible deformity. Several studies reveal that early, effective interventions have better long-term psychological outcomes.
Complications and long-term follow-up
Although the different reconstructive surgeries have high success rates, they also have some risks and/or consequences. Complications such as postoperative infections, scarring, and the need for revision surgery also happened. However, advancements in surgical techniques and postoperative medical care have reduced such anticipated complications. Long-term monitoring after the surgery is the key element to address any emerging issues and provide ongoing support.12
Recent innovation and their impact
The utilization of the new digital technologies, such as 3D printing, virtual surgical simulation, and planning, in addition to the customized implants, has revolutionized the craniofacial surgery field. These developed techniques have not only enhanced surgical accuracy but also improved the functional and aesthetic outcomes and mitigated the chance of revision surgeries. And most importantly, improve the child's quality of life.13
FAQs
What is the surgery for frontonasal dysplasia?
The surgery involves reconstruction of a deformed nose and correction of the eye socket position in early childhood.
What are the frontonasal dysplasia symptoms?
Symptoms are widely spaced eyes, a broad, flat nose, clefts in the lips and middle of the face, a gap in the skull’s front, and sometimes alopecia.
What are the different types of frontonasal dysplasia?
Type 1: flat, wide, deformed nose, long area between the nose tip and lip, and droopy upper eyelid.
Type 2: enlarged skull opening, hair loss, and genital abnormalities in males.
Type 3: no eye openings or small eyes, low-set ears, and severe facial deformation.
What is the frontonasal process?
It is a crucial process during the embryonic stage; in the early stages of facial development, the forehead, nose, and the center of the upper lip are formed.
Summary
Reconstructive surgery for frontonasal dysplasia is a rapidly evolving field. Both aesthetic and functional outcomes are presented with a tremendous advancement in the use of modern techniques and technologies. Early interventions and customized measures, along with cutting-edge innovations, provide children and individuals suffering from FND with a great chance to enjoy healthy and satisfying lives. With ongoing technological development and research on new techniques, the treatment of FND seems to be more promising and achievable.
References
- Frontonasal dysplasia: a review [Internet]. Vol. 66, Journal of Biochemical and Clinical Genetics. 2018 May p. 66–76. Available from: https://jbcgenetics.com/fulltext/183-1530765389.pdf
- Kean J, Al-Busaidi SSM, Quaba AA. A case report of frontonasal dysplasia. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology [Internet]. 2010 Mar 1;74(3):306–8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2009.12.002
- Wan DC, Tanna N, Allam KA, Perry A, Bradley JP. Gradual Orbital Contraction after Facial Bipartition: Correction of Wide No. 0 to 14 Craniofacial Cleft. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery [Internet]. 2010 Dec 1;126(6):2109–12. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0b013e3181f44802
- Roumeliotis G, Inciarte M, Thomas G, Wall S, Mathijssen I, Johnson D. Congenital ossification defects of the frontal bone: description of a novel clinical entity and the management of four patients. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery [Internet]. 2020 Nov 4;32(1):92–6. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000007066
- Kim YB, Nam SM, Park ES, Choi CY, Cha HG, Kim JH. Nasal reconstruction of a frontonasal dysplasia via septal L-Strut reconstruction using costal cartilage. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal [Internet]. 2021 Aug 17;59(10):1306–13. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656211036614
- Song SY, Choi JW, Lew HW, Koh KS. Nasal reconstruction of a frontonasal dysplasia deformity using aesthetic rhinoplasty techniques. Archives of Plastic Surgery [Internet]. 2015 Sep 1;42(05):637–9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2015.42.5.637
- Sebastiani AM, Rebelatto NLB, Klüppel LE, Da Costa DJ, Antonini F, De Moraes RS. Le Fort III osteotomy for severe dentofacial deformity correction associated with hypoplasia of the midface. RGO - Revista Gaúcha De Odontologia [Internet]. 2016 Dec 1;64(4):453–9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-8637201600030000143129
- Al-Namnam NMN, Hariri F, Rahman Z a A. Distraction osteogenesis in the surgical management of syndromic craniosynostosis: a comprehensive review of published papers. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery [Internet]. 2018 Jun 1;56(5):353–66. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2018.03.002
- Buonocore SD, Walker ME, Steinbacher DM. Repair of the median microform cleft lip using Z-Plasty. Modern Plastic Surgery [Internet]. 2012 Jan 1;02(03):43–5. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4236/mps.2012.23011
- Denadai R, Raposo-Amaral CA, Raposo-Amaral CE. Fat grafting in managing craniofacial deformities. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery [Internet]. 2019 May 1;143(5):1447–55. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000005555
- Schlund M, Paré A, Joly A, Laure B. Computer-Assisted surgery in facial bipartition surgery. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery [Internet]. 2018 May 1;76(5):1094.e1-1094.e7. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2017.12.013
- an Den Elzen MEP, Versnel SL, Wolvius EB, Van Veelen MLC, Vaandrager JM, Van Der Meulen JC, et al. Long-term results after 40 years experience with treatment of rare facial clefts: Part 2 – symmetrical median clefts. Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery [Internet]. 2011 Oct 1;64(10):1344–52. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2011.04.023
- Roddi R, Oo A, Pepe E, Naing E, Sung S. Surgical strategy for the treatment of facial clefts. Surgical Techniques Development [Internet]. 2023 Jan 25;12(1):34–42. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2038-9582/12/1/2

