Risk Factors For Hantavirus Infection In Rural Versus Suburban Areas
Published on: July 16, 2025
risk factors for hantavirus infection in rural versus suburban areas
Article author photo

Jennifer Ilione

Bachelor of Applied Science - BASc, Applied Medical Sciences, Swansea University

Article reviewer photo

Maya Khimji

BA Global Health and Social Medicine, King’s College London

Introduction 

Hantavirus is a zoonotic disease primarily transmitted to humans through exposure to infected rodents and their droppings. The most severe form of Hantavirus infection, Hantavirus Pulmonary Syndrome (HPS), can be fatal, with mortality rates reaching up to 40%.1 The disease is most prevalent in the Americas, where rodent species act as the primary reservoir.1 While rural areas have historically been associated with higher rates of Hantavirus infections due to closer proximity to wildlife, suburban areas are increasingly becoming important to study due to urban expansion and habitat disruption.2 This article explores the risk factors for Hantavirus infection in rural and suburban areas, comparing the environmental, behavioural, and infrastructural elements that contribute to infection risks in these two settings.

Hantavirus epidemiology

Hantavirus infections are found in several regions across North and South America, with the United States, Argentina, and Chile reporting the highest incidence rates.1,2 HPS is especially common in the southwestern United States, where the primary rodent host, the deer mouse (Peromyscus maniculatus), is widespread.1 Other rodent species, such as cotton rats and rice rats, also serve as Hantavirus reservoirs in different regions.2 

Hantavirus is transmitted to humans through inhalation of aerosolised virus particles that come from rodent urine, droppings, or saliva.2 Contact with contaminated surfaces or bites from infected rodents can also transmit the virus.1 Rodents often thrive in environments close to human habitation, making both rural and suburban areas susceptible to outbreaks. Although the risk may seem more apparent in rural regions, suburban areas, with their growing human-rodent interaction, also present significant dangers.

Risk factors for hantavirus in rural areas

Rodent population and exposure

In rural areas, the natural landscape, open spaces, and proximity to wild habitats increase the likelihood of human-rodent interactions. Rodents, particularly the deer mouse, thrive in rural environments, including forests, fields, and farmlands.3 Rodent populations are less likely to be controlled due to the vast expanses of land in these areas. Rodents use barns, storage sheds, and even homes as shelter, which elevates the risk of human exposure to the virus.3 

Because rural residents often live close to nature, activities such as farming, harvesting, and storing crops frequently bring them into contact with rodent-infested areas. For instance, farming equipment left in barns or fields may be contaminated with rodent droppings, and workers can easily inhale the virus while handling it.4 People living in rural homes may also store food in ways that inadvertently attract rodents, creating further opportunities for exposure.

Human activities in rural areas

The lifestyle in rural areas often includes activities that increase the chance of Hantavirus exposure. Farming, forestry, hiking, and camping in wilderness areas expose rural inhabitants to rodent habitats.5 Farmers who frequently enter barns, sheds, or grain storage facilities are at an elevated risk since these buildings often house rodent nests. Outdoor workers, like loggers or field hands, are also at increased risk, particularly when disturbing woodpiles or other rodent-prone areas.6

Additionally, rural residents are more likely to handle and clean spaces that are infested with rodents, such as unused buildings or garages. Cleaning up rodent droppings or nests without proper protective equipment (e.g., gloves, masks) can lead to inhaling the virus, which can cause infection.7

Housing conditions and sanitation

In rural areas, housing may be older or less insulated, allowing easier access for rodents. Open fields or forests often surround homes in rural regions, and they may lack sufficient barriers to prevent rodents from entering. Moreover, the relative remoteness of rural communities means that garbage collection may not be as frequent, which can attract rodents to human dwellings. The combination of less-sealed housing and increased rodent presence heightens the risk of Hantavirus transmission indoors2.

Risk factors for hantavirus in suburban areas

Urban expansion and rodent habitat disruption

Suburban areas, which are characterised by urban expansion into previously undeveloped areas, are becoming increasingly vulnerable to Hantavirus infections. As urban sprawl encroaches on natural rodent habitats, rodents such as deer mice and cotton rats are forced into closer contact with human populations. Residential developments, especially those near forests or fields, can lead to increased rodent-human interaction as rodents seek food and shelter in suburban homes.8

Furthermore, newly constructed homes in suburban areas often disrupt existing rodent habitats, causing rodents to move into garages, attics, or yards. The presence of landscaping features like gardens, bushes, or compost piles may unintentionally provide food and shelter for these rodents, further increasing the risk of exposure to the virus.8

Waste management and rodent access

Waste management practices in suburban areas can also play a role in attracting rodents. Poorly secured trash bins, improperly stored pet food, or compost piles can serve as food sources for rodents, drawing them closer to homes.9 Residents in suburban neighbourhoods may not realise the importance of securing waste properly, inadvertently increasing the rodent population in their vicinity.

Additionally, construction sites in suburban developments often leave behind debris, woodpiles, and other materials that can harbour rodents. As rodents move between construction zones and residential areas, the chance of spreading the virus increases.9 Therefore, improper waste management and poor construction site maintenance can be significant risk factors for Hantavirus infection in suburban areas.

Pets and rodent transmission

In suburban settings, pets such as cats and dogs can also play a role in spreading Hantavirus. While pets themselves cannot contract the virus, they can bring infected rodents or their droppings into homes. Cats, in particular, may hunt and kill infected rodents, potentially exposing their owners to Hantavirus if they come into contact with the carcass or droppings.10

Pet food stored outdoors or in accessible areas can also attract rodents, increasing the likelihood of human exposure. Suburban pet owners may unknowingly contribute to rodent infestations by leaving pet food out overnight, which encourages rodents to invade garages, basements, or storage areas.

Comparative analysis of rural and suburban risk factors

Differences in rodent exposure

In rural areas, the natural landscape and less controlled environments contribute to a higher rodent population and greater human exposure. Rural residents are more likely to encounter rodents in their homes, fields, and storage facilities. In contrast, suburban areas, while having fewer rodents overall, face a unique risk due to habitat disruption caused by urban expansion. Suburban residents might not expect to encounter rodents and may take fewer precautions, leading to increased risk in unexpected ways.11

Human behaviour and lifestyle differences

The lifestyles of rural and suburban populations differ significantly, affecting their risk of Hantavirus exposure. Rural populations often engage in activities that put them in direct contact with rodents, such as farming, forestry, and outdoor work. In contrast, suburban residents may not frequently enter rodent-prone areas but can still be at risk due to rodent infestation in their homes or yards.12 Additionally, suburbanites may be less aware of the dangers posed by rodent exposure, while rural residents may have more experience dealing with rodents but still face heightened risk due to frequent contact.12

Environmental and infrastructure factors

Housing quality, rodent control measures, and sanitation practices differ between rural and suburban areas. Rural homes may be older and less rodent-proof, with fewer resources for pest control. In suburban areas, the presence of large gardens, landscaping, and improper waste storage can attract rodents despite the better construction of homes. Infrastructure, such as roads and barriers, may also play a role in limiting rodent movement in suburban areas, while rural areas lack these preventive structures.12

Preventive measures in rural and suburban areas

Rodent control and management

Effective rodent control is crucial in both rural and suburban settings to reduce Hantavirus risk. In rural areas, sealing homes and storage areas, proper waste disposal, and regular cleaning of barns and sheds can reduce the likelihood of rodent infestations. In suburban areas, rodent-proofing homes, securing trash bins, and eliminating food sources like pet food and birdseed can help minimise contact with infected rodents.13

Public health interventions

Public health strategies should focus on educating both rural and suburban populations about the risks of Hantavirus and how to avoid exposure. Educational campaigns that emphasise the importance of proper rodent control, waste management, and cleaning techniques can be effective in reducing infections. Additionally, health authorities should promote the use of protective gear, such as masks and gloves, when cleaning areas where rodent droppings may be present.13

Conclusion

In both rural and suburban areas, the risk factors for Hantavirus infection stem from human-rodent interactions, but the nature of these interactions varies based on environment and lifestyle. Rural areas have higher rodent populations and more direct exposure due to outdoor activities and older housing structures. Suburban areas face growing risks as urban expansion disrupts natural rodent habitats and brings rodents closer to homes. Understanding these differences is key to developing tailored prevention strategies that reduce Hantavirus infections in both settings. Further research should explore the long-term effectiveness of rodent control measures and the impact of climate change on rodent populations to better mitigate future risks.

References

  1. Moore RA, Griffen D. Hantavirus Syndrome [Internet]. PubMed. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2021. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK513243/
  2. Jonsson CB, Figueiredo LTM, Vapalahti O. A Global Perspective on Hantavirus Ecology, Epidemiology, and Disease. Clinical Microbiology Reviews [Internet]. 2010 Apr 1;23(2):412–41. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2863364/
  3. Donnelly TM, Bergin I, Ihrig M. Biology and Diseases of Other Rodents. Laboratory Animal Medicine. 2015;285–349.
  4. Backhans A, Fellström C. Rodents on pig and chicken farms – a potential threat to human and animal health. Infection Ecology & Epidemiology [Internet]. 2012 Feb 17 [cited 2020 Jun 7];2. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3426328/
  5. Giovenale Moirano, Botta A, Yang M, Mangeruga M, Murray K, Paolo Vineis. Land-cover, land-use and human hantavirus infection risk: a systematic review. Pathogens and Global Health. 2023 Oct 24;1–15.
  6. Riccò M, Peruzzi S, Ranzieri S, Magnavita N. Occupational Hantavirus Infections in Agricultural and Forestry Workers: A Systematic Review and Metanalysis. Viruses. 2021 Oct 25;13(11):2150.
  7. Phipatanakul W, Matsui E, Portnoy J, Williams PB, Barnes C, Kennedy K, et al. Environmental assessment and exposure reduction of rodents: a practice parameter. Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. 2012 Dec;109(6):375–87.
  8. Blasdell KR, Morand S, Laurance SGW, Doggett SL, Hahs A, Trinh K, et al. Rats and the city: Implications of urbanization on zoonotic disease risk in Southeast Asia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2022 Sep 19;119(39).
  9. Sharp D. On Rats, Refuse, and Recycling. Journal of Urban Health. 2007 Mar 12;84(5):637–8.
  10. Hardgrove E, Zimmerman DM, von Fricken ME, Deem S. A scoping review of rodent-borne pathogen presence, exposure, and transmission at zoological institutions. Preventive Veterinary Medicine. 2021 Aug;193:105345.
  11. Morzillo AT, Mertig AG. Linking human behaviour to environmental effects using a case study of urban rodent control. International Journal of Environmental Studies. 2011 Feb;68(1):107–23.
  12. Oh HYP, Humaidi M, Chan QY, Yap G, Ang KY, Tan J, et al. Association of rodents with man-made infrastructures and food waste in Urban Singapore. Infection Ecology & Epidemiology. 2022 Jan 28;12(1).
  13. Mazza V, Guenther A. City mice and country mice: innovative problem solving in rural and urban noncommensal rodents. Animal Behaviour. 2021 Feb;172:197–210.
Share

Jennifer Ilione

Bachelor of Applied Science - BASc, Applied Medical Sciences, Swansea University

arrow-right